February 29 2008 - The TUC is today (Friday) calling on the Chancellor to increase the
weekly limit on statutory redundancy pay from £330 to £500 in the
forthcoming Budget as a major step towards restoring the real value of the
limit when it was first introduced at £40 in 1965.
Anyone who has worked for the same employer for more than two years is
entitled to redundancy pay (which is paid by the Government if the
employer goes bust). It is calculated as half a week's pay for each year of
employment between the ages of 18 to 21; plus one week's pay for each
year of employment between 22 to 40; plus one and a half week's pay for each year of employment between the age
of 41 or over but under 65. No more than twenty years service can be
counted.
But there is a statutory maximum limit to what counts as a week's pay -
anything earned in excess of this limit is not counted when working
out redundancy pay. This is set annually and is currently £330 per week.
Official figures show that more than half the working population earn
more than this a week (53 per cent). Mean pay is £452 a week, so the
current limit is just 73 per cent of average pay. Employers are free to
offer more generous terms, and many do.
When redundancy pay was introduced for the first time in 1965 the limit
was set at £40, more than twice the average wage (£19.60). If the
limit had been uprated in line with prices it would now be a little over
£500, and if increased in line with earnings it would now be in excess of
£1,000.
TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said: 'Now is the right time to
start to restore the value of redundancy pay. When it was introduced the
big majority of the workforce had all their wages counted when working
out their redundancy pay, but now more than half the workforce would
lose out.
'The Government pledged in its manifesto for the last election to boost
redundancy and that pledge should be implemented. A one off rise to
£500 and a link to earnings rather than prices in future is the minimum
we need to see to start to restore some fairness.'